Dylann Roof’s Manifesto

I’ve written a lot (too much) about racism; I’m not going to spend any time parsing Dylann Roof’s manifesto–obviously he’s wrong and he’s bad, and so are the people who deplore his acts while endorsing his analysis.

I would just add that the KKK and the CCC and even the neo-Nazi groups like the NPI aren’t the biggest problem we face as a nation when it comes to racism–even most racists find them despicable. And they’re not being disingenuous when they disown Roof. The CCC’s Jared Taylor, for example, is a separatist, not an eliminationist; he believes that white nationalists should emulate Israeli settlers, Chasids in upstate NY, and the die-hard separatists in Rhodesia and build white-only ethnocracies.

One thing they do have in common with Roof is that they no longer presume to speak for “America,” but for cadres of right-thinking whites. They believe the Republic was poisoned at its inception by its “all men are created equal” rhetoric and finished by the Civil War and the 13th Amendment. If they aren’t as sanguinary as Roof, they hate the US with an equal passion. Here are Root’s words on patriotism, veterans, Jews, and the flag, which are sure to bring Tea Partiers and Libertarians and Democrats and Republicans together in execration:

I hate the sight of the American flag. Modern American patriotism is an absolute joke. People pretending like they have something to be proud while White people are being murdered daily in the streets. Many veterans believe we owe them something for “protecting our way of life” or “protecting our freedom”. But im not sure what way of life they are talking about. How about we protect the White race and stop fighting for the jews. I will say this though, I myself would have rather lived in 1940’s American than Nazi Germany, and no this is not ignorance speaking, it is just my opinion. So I dont blame the veterans of any wars up until after Vietnam, because at least they had an American to be proud of and fight for.

As loathsome as fringe racists like Taylor are, as despicable and dangerous as psychopathic nut jobs like Roof are, I believe that the mainstream enablers, sustainers, and normalizers of white privilege–the people who believe that separate and unequal schools and neighborhoods and opportunity structures, a militarized police force and citizenry, and an attendant prison-industrial complex are the bulwarks of their freedom–are far worse.

What matters the most isn’t what the likes of Dylann Roof wrote and said, but what so many “legitimate” politicians and pundits are NOT saying. Those are the people whose feet need to be held to the fire.

10 thoughts on “Dylann Roof’s Manifesto

  1. I agree completely, Arthur Goldwag, and I am dragging from the horrors of what happened at the Emanuel A.M.C. Church the hope that those legiitmate politicians will pay a horrendous but justified price for their decades of enabling.

  2. What follows is not trolling, but an exposition of relevant issues.

    I would like to not have to consider eliminationism. The following is however much more cogent than Roof’s manifesto:

    , and one can understand the appeal, though ultimately one cannot ethically advocate that, especially considering that incentives based sterilization is a more benevolent approach.

    Ultimately, racial matters are eugenics matters, and the following suggests that Jewish individuals kept eugenics for themselves while demonizing it for others: http://www.eugenics.net/papers/Radical_New_Int.html

    Of course not all Jewish individuals could be said to have done this. Notable exceptions, whose work extends into racial considerations, are Otto Weininger and Oscar Levy, and in modern times Michael Levin (author of “Why Race Matters”) has offered relevant commentaries.

    Here is the crux of the matter:

    And here is applied dysgenics:

    It is relevant to point out that Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the Pan-Europe movement, wrote in “Praktischer Idealismus” that “The man of the distant future will be a mongrel. The races and castes of today will fall victim to the conquest of space, time and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, outwardly similar to the Ancient Egyptians (on whom see: http://marchofthetitans.com/vol1chap8.htm), will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. […] Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this goal, where a small group of communist spiritual aristocrats govern the land […] The general staff of both parties [Communist and Capitalist] is recruited from the spiritual leader race (Führerrasse) of Europe: the Jews. […] No wonder then, that these people, who escaped the ghetto-prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. A gracious providence provided Europe, at the moment when the feudal aristocracy fell into disrepair, with a new race of nobility through spiritual grace, thanks to Jewish emancipation.”: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/03/spiritual-leader-race-fuhrerrasse-of.html?zx=d4137fee0c19efa6, more on this text here: http://balder.org/judea/Richard-Coudenhove-Kalergi-Practical-Idealism-Vienna-1925.php, a scanned copy is here: https://archive.org/details/Coudenhove-Kalergi-Praktischer-Idealismus-2 – the political relevance of this text is spelled out by Dieter Schwarz in Die Freimaurerei. Weltanschauung, Organisation und Politik, Zentral Verlag der NSDAP, Berlin, (1938), p. 40: https://www.scribd.com/doc/103556590/Schwarz-Dieter-Die-Freimaurerei-Weltanschauung-Organisation-Und-Politik-1938-68-S-Scan-Fraktur – the English translation of which is as follows:
    “The Grand Lodge Of Wien went enthusiastically to work for the Pan European Union in a call to all Masonic chief authorities. Even the Masonic newspaper The Beacon enthused about the thoughts of the higher degree Freemason Coudenhove-Kalergi, and stated in March, 1925:
    “Freemasonry, especially Austrian Freemasonry, may be eminently satisfied to have Coudenhove-Kalergi among its members. Austrian Freemasonry can rightly report that Brother Coudenhove-Kalergi fights for his Pan European beliefs: political honesty, social insight, the struggle against lies, striving for the recognition and cooperation of all those of good will. In this higher sense, Brother Coudenhove-Kalergi’s program is a Masonic work of the highest order, and to be able to work on it together is a lofty task for all brother Masons.””: https://web.archive.org/web/20090826133215/http://thecensureofdemocracy.150m.com/masonry.htm

    The video presentation “Sarkozy: Métissage OBLIGATOIRE pour la France, pas pour Israël” can be viewed in this context:

    Very few politicians (the kind demonized as “extreme rightists” on this site) will publicly speak out against this:

    The fact that Charles Darwin merely made honest observations as to the innate inferiority (at least outside of primitive living conditions) of certain groups: http://www.heretical.com/darwin/darwin4.html [also see G.W.F. Hegel in “The Philosophy of History” (Colonial Press, 1900) – pp. 93-99: “The peculiarly African character is difficult to comprehend, for the very reason that in reference to it we must quite give up the principle which accompanies all our ideas— the category of Universality…. Another characteristic fact in reference to the Negro is slavery… Bad as this may be, their lot in their own land is even worse, since a slavery there quite as absolute exists; for it is the essential principle of slavery, that man has not yet attained to a consciousness of his own freedom, and consequently sinks down to a mere Thing— an object of no value. Among the Negro moral sentiments are quite weak, or more strictly speaking, non-existent. Parents sell their children and conversely children their parents, as either has the opportunity… the polygamy of the Negroes has frequently for its object the having of many children, to be sold, every one of them, into slavery… From these various traits it is manifest that want of self control distinguishes the character of the Negroes. This condition is capable of no development or culture, and as we see them at this day, such have they always been…. At this point we leave Africa, not to mention it again. For it is no historical part of the World; it has no movement or development to exhibit.”], and yet these observations today are viewed as reactionary extreme rightist rhetoric (though most great European philosophers would today be viewed as extreme rightists, for another example, see this: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter5.html, and for the facts behind the facade in this case, see the article “Egalitarian Fiction and Collective Fraud”: http://www.eugenics.net/papers/Gottfredson.htm) suggests that modern racial politics has the subtext of subverting and degrading (particularly European) cultures.

    1. Unless there is a reply to this statement, this will be the last statement I will make. I don’t care that this reaches your comments section or not, just that this reaches you.

      The purpose of my messages to you was that I believe you are a contributor to cultural toxins and also because I believe it is in your own self interest to support Right Wing (or 3rd position) Nationalist movements in other countries (like the US and Europe), particularly given that you live in one of them. I believe that the best, most righteous position a Jew can take is to be a Zionist for himself while supporting majoritarian ethnic National revivals in other countries, or, if he is not a Zionist, then to support ethnic nationalism anyway, just like these people, who could rightly be called “good jews”, profiled in the article “German Nationalist Jews During the Weimar and Early Third Reich Eras”: http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2013/volume_5/number_3/german_nationalist_jews.php

      If you give your allegiance to the moderate to far Right you will be able to prevent the emergence of the far, far right. From an ethical perspective, we have Duchesne’s article “Jürgen Habermas and the Abolition of German Ethnic Nationality”: http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2014/07/jurgen-habermas-and-abolition-of-german-ethnic-nationality.html

      beyond that is a useful article entitled “The Survival of the Liberal West Requires Ethnic Nationalism”: http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2014/08/survival-of-liberal-west-requires-ethnic-nationalism.html

      And if tendencies toward that don’t increase now, then they will (if Whites are to survive and thrive), go to the extreme, extreme right, and possibly endanger the safety of your progeny (I am not threatening you, but just highlighting possible cultural trends). Aristotle, in Politics Book 5, wrote that “Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution; for example, the Achaeans who joined the Troezenians in the foundation of Sybaris, becoming later the more numerous, expelled them; hence the curse fell upon Sybaris. At Thurii the Sybarites quarrelled with their fellow-colonists; thinking that the land belonged to them, they wanted too much of it and were driven out. At Byzantium the new colonists were detected in a conspiracy, and were expelled by force of arms; the people of Antissa, who had received the Chian exiles, fought with them, and drove them out; and the Zancleans, after having received the Samians, were driven by them out of their own city. The citizens of Apollonia on the Euxine, after the introduction of a fresh body of colonists, had a revolution; the Syracusans, after the expulsion of their tyrants, having admitted strangers and mercenaries to the rights of citizenship, quarrelled and came to blows; the people of Amphipolis, having received Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by them.”: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.5.five.html

      We can look at cyclical theorists like Spengler (Spengler and Nietzsche are in my opinion much better than many popular modern theorists) and extrapolate cultural trends:

      From that person who summarizes some of Spengler’s thought, we also have the following:

      With the following useful accompanying text:
      “The question whether world peace will ever be possible can only be answered by someone familiar with world history. To be familiar with world history means, however, to know human beings as they have been and always will be. There is a vast difference, which most people will never comprehend, between viewing future history as it will be and viewing it as one might like it to be. Peace is a desire, war is a fact; and history has never paid heed to human desires and ideals.

      Life is a struggle involving plants, animals, and humans. It is a struggle between individuals, social classes, peoples, and nations, and it can take the form of economic, social, political, and military competition. It is a struggle for the power to make one’s will prevail, to exploit one’s advantage, or to advance one’s opinion of what is just or expedient. When other means fail, recourse will be taken time and again to the ultimate means: violence. An individual who uses violence can be branded a criminal, a class can be called revolutionary or traitorous, a people bloodthirsty. But that does not alter the facts. Modern world-communism calls its wars “uprisings,” imperialist nations describe theirs as “pacification of foreign peoples.” And if the world existed as a unified state, wars would likewise be referred to as “uprisings.” The distinctions here are purely verbal.

      Talk of world peace is heard today only among the white peoples, and not among the much more numerous colored races. This is a perilous state of affairs. When individual thinkers and idealists talk of peace, as they have done since time immemorial, the effect is always negligible. But when whole peoples become pacifistic it is a symptom of senility. Strong and unspent races are not pacifistic. To adopt such a position is to abandon the future, for the pacifist ideal is a static, terminal condition that is contrary to the basic facts of existence.

      As long as man continues to evolve there will be wars. Should the white peoples ever become so tired of war that their governments can no longer incite them to wage it, the earth will inevitably fall a victim to the colored men, just as the Roman Empire succumbed to the Teutons. Pacifism means yielding power to the inveterate nonpacifists. Among the latter there will always be white men — adventurers, conquerors, leader-types — whose following increases with every success. If a revolt against the whites were to occur today in Asia, countless whites would join the rebels simply because they are tired of peaceful living.

      Pacifism will remain an ideal, war a fact. If the white races are resolved never to wage war again, the colored will act differently and be rulers of the world.” ~Oswald Spengler Selected Essays [paraphrased]

      That pacifist tendency among Whites won’t last very long as things are exacerbated like we see here:

      If things continue, then opponents of Whites will deserve what they get.

      It is also unethical to support White guilt, because in doing so you are encouraging large scale cultural dysgenics. We are already are 14 IQ points more stupid than we were in the Victorian era. See the study “Were the Victorians cleverer than us? The decline in general intelligence estimated from a meta-analysis of the slowing of simple reaction time” (Intelligence, Volume 41, Issue 6, November–December 2013, pages 843–850), which states in the abstract: “The Victorian era was marked by an explosion of innovation and genius, per capita rates of which appear to have declined subsequently. The presence of dysgenic fertility for IQ amongst Western nations, starting in the 19th century, suggests that these trends might be related to declining IQ. This is because high-IQ people are more productive and more creative. We tested the hypothesis that the Victorians were cleverer than modern populations, using high-quality instruments, namely measures of simple visual reaction time in a meta-analytic study. Simple reaction time measures correlate substantially with measures of general intelligence (g) and are considered elementary measures of cognition. In this study we used the data on the secular slowing of simple reaction time described in a meta-analysis of 14 age-matched studies from Western countries conducted between 1889 and 2004 to estimate the decline in g that may have resulted from the presence of dysgenic fertility. Using psychometric meta-analysis we computed the true correlation between simple reaction time and g, yielding a decline of − 1.16 IQ points per decade or − 13.35 IQ points since Victorian times. These findings strongly indicate that with respect to g the Victorians were substantially cleverer than modern Western populations.”: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470

      Also see “Is there a dysgenic secular trend towards slowing simple reaction time? Responding to a quartet of critical commentaries” (Intelligence Volume 46, September–October 2014, pages 131–147), which states in the abstract: “Previously Woodley, te Nijenhuis and Murphy (2013) tested the hypothesis that Victorian era British and American samples exhibited higher g on average than relatively more modern populations sampled from the US, UK, Canada, Australia and Finland, using measures of simple visual reaction time in a meta-analytic study. Based on 13 age-matched studies from Western countries conducted between 1884 and 2004 yielding 16 data points we estimated a decline of − 13.35 IQ points. Here we respond to a quartet of critical commentaries on our paper penned by five prominent intelligence researchers (James Flynn, Theodore Nettelbeck, Irwin Silverman, Julia Dodonova and Yuri Dodonov). We show via various reanalyses of the data and also via careful consideration of the arguments presented that the original finding of a potential secular decline in simple reaction time performance is robust. A recurrent criticism of our finding stems from earlier work showing no secular trends with respect to inspection time over a 20-year period in Australia despite the possibility of co-occurring dysgenic fertility. We deal with this via the method of correlated vectors, which reveals the presence of a ‘genetic g’ common factor on which simple RTs, WAIS g loadings and subtest heritabilities load positively and significantly, but on which inspection time does not load. This indicates that inspection times are associated with local information processing, unlike simple reaction times, which are associated with global processing (i.e. g). The robustness of our original finding is best illustrated however by our final meta-regression, in which the use of six methods variance-controlled reaction time means taken from the US and the UK between 1889 and 1993, coupled with a newly-estimated age-matched reference standard deviation, reveal a seemingly robust secular trend towards slowing reaction time in these two countries, which translates into a potential dysgenics rate of − 1.21 IQ points per decade, or − 13.9 points in total between 1889 and 2004. We conclude by arguing that the best way forward is to test novel predictions stemming from our finding relating to molecular genetics, neurophysiology and alternative cognitive indicators, thus shifting the research focus away from the purely methodological level towards the broader nomological level. We thank our critics for helping us to arrive at a much more precise estimate of the decline in general intelligence.”: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000841

      There are many likely causes of this. Feminism had been discredited by authors like Michael Levin in “Feminism and Freedom”, but it also destroys societies by changing female evolutionary pressures: https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/, and leads to culture distortion as is exposed here: http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html

      and here:

      and here:

      and here:

      And also by eloquent authors like Ludovici.

      (as an aside, modern women are completely degraded – Schopenhauer was writing about what they were like in his time, but look at this:


      Multiculturalism has been addressed above. What was not addressed, but what should be obvious, is that studies on ethnic heterogeneity have found many negative effects: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_heterogeneity

      It all makes sense when you see the findings of Sir Arthur Keith: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Keith#A_New_Theory_of_Human_Evolution_.281948.29

      And in general modernity is degeneracy. Here is an admission that modernity was created by Jews: “It’s become clear to me that the Fox commentator Glenn Beck has something of a Jewish problem.Actually, he has something of a modernity problem, and people with modernity problems tend to have problems with Jews, who more or less invented modernity (Einstein, Marx, Freud, Franz Boas, etc.)”: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/01/glenn-becks-jewish-problem/69682/

      The following overview of Alain Soral brings up an unfortunate consequence of degenerate modernity: “For Soral, the Judeo-bourgeois world is becoming deeply anti-human, effeminizing, based on the miscegenation and destruction of all nations and cultures, turning all human beings into interchangeable economic agents, simultaneously destroying both national cohesion (because of internal balkanization) and authentic international diversity (all submitting to the same faux globo-culture), with any substantive dissent severely punished.”: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/07/alain-soral-faq-part-3/

      Also, as I noted before:
      “Ludovici adopted a nom de guerre, Cobbett, to examine the Jewish question more fully in The Jews, and the Jews in England (London, 1938). (He told his friend, William Gayley Simpson, that using his own name for this book would ruin his career as a writer.) Typically, he began with race, demonstrating that the Jewish type is mostly an amalgam of Armenoid with Oriental and Mediterranean contributions, the whole having been standardized over millennia to create an “irreducible kernel” of Jewishness. Jews are therefore alien to European races and especially Nordics. Tracing their character traits back to nomadic bedouins who became city-dwellers, traders and middlemen supreme, Ludovici believed circumstances compelled Jews to evolve genetic biases toward courage and endurance, ruthlessness, sharp brains and psychological flair, chameleonic adaptability, exhibitionism, a fondness for easy money and individualism in property, an intolerance of being ruled, a cosmopolitan outlook, and a racial patriotism superseding national boundaries. Programmed with this mindset, Jews are “indifferent spectators” to the fate of their Gentile hosts, whom they strive to undermine:
      “Their influence . . . tends to impoverish and weaken all local tradition, national character and national identity, when these happen to be at all resistant to alien invasion. And since these factors are integrating forces, it follows that extreme Jewish liberalism atomizes a population, turns each man into an isolated individual, and ultimately culminates in a state bordering on anarchy in which, at the turn of an eyebrow, anarchy becomes a fact.”
      The eternal bedouins had scavenged capitalism to such an extent by the 1930s that Ludovici forecast they might be turning next to communism — perhaps “merely a device or substitute for moving on to some fresh oasis or pasture, where docile flocks of sheep will continue to maintain their bureaucratic masters in idleness.” He failed to see that many Jews would eventually metamorphose into “neoconservatives” as Zionism began to outrank Marxism in their list of priorities.”

      Ludovici’s book on the subject can be read here: http://www.revilo-oliver.com/Writers/Ludovici/The_Jews_in_England_preface.html

      However, I am favorable to the following viewpoint from the Soral overview, in spite of not being a Christian:
      “Soral’s criticism of the organized Jewish community is entirely one of an ideological critique of Judaism-Zionism as a project for global supremacism through racism and deceit as expressed in the Tanakh and the Talmud. Whether or not he suspects any genetic predisposition [which there probably is a basis for: http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=45078%5D among Jews for ethnocentrism (he has spoken of the “hatred” of Polish-origin Ashkenazim), his line is a Christian one that anyone can be redeemed: an individual may be predisposed towards this or that by his background and upbringing, but ultimately they can always choose salvation by sincerely joining the national community.”

      It is in your own self-interest, as a Jew, to support Right Wing Nationalism in order to prevent extreme manifestations of neo-fascism. It is also ethical, because it reverses dysgenic trends, and preserves the quality of breeding stock who have historically been the major contributors to scientific and cultural progress (racial inferences stare you in the face from reading Murray’s “Human Accomplishment” and Duchesne’s book,and are of course well supported: http://www.vdare.com/articles/vladimir-avdeyev-and-the-russian-revival-of-racial-science).

      Also, the majority of emasculated whites are not yet anti-Semites, even though anti-Semitism is a universal phenomenon (it is incorrect to classify anti-Semitism as an irrational by product of Christianity, as numerous classical writers of antiquity observed and held aversion to Jewish behavior – arguments in favor of this, as well as arguments falsifying attempts by Josephus to present some classical writers as having favorable opinions of Jews, can be found here: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asemiticcontroversies.blogspot.com+Against+Apion&rlz=1C1WLXB_enUS640US640&oq=site%3Asemiticcontroversies.blogspot.com+Against+Apion&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.10408j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
      Also, among Enlightenment and major philosophers, Benjamin Franklin expressed aversion towards Jews in his letters (http://franklinpapers.org/franklin/framedVolumes.jsp?vol=36&page=248a, http://franklinpapers.org/franklin/framedVolumes.jsp?vol=36&page=113a), as did Voltaire: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/30/books/l-voltaire-and-the-jews-590990.html, as did Immanuel Kant in his writings: http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/03/immanuel-kant-on-jews.html, as did Arthur Schopenhauer in his writings: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/07/schopenhauer-on-race-differences-in-intelligence-and-on-judaism/, http://www.cwporter.com/schop.htm, as did Martin Heidegger: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/mar/13/martin-heidegger-black-notebooks-reveal-nazi-ideology-antisemitism) On this, Otto Weininger made the interesting remark, “Zola was a typical case of a person absolutely without trace of the Jewish qualities, and, therefore, a philosemite. The greatest geniuses, on the other hand, have nearly always been antisemites (Tacitus, Pascal, Voltaire, Herder, Goethe, Kant, Jean Paul, Schopenhauer, Grillparzer, Wagner); this comes about from the fact as geniuses they have something of everything in their natures, and so can understand Judaism.”: https://books.google.com/books?id=XrysvMtsAVwC&pg=PA304#v=onepage&q&f=false

      On “The Universality of Anti-Semitism”, see: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/soc.culture.usa/aMnm8VD5njY/MQ7V)

      Jews could possibly be contributors to culture vitalism, rather than culture distortion, and if they care about themselves and the world as a whole, they will change their course of action.

  3. OK, Ben Steigmann, I am letting you have the last word. Surely you have nothing left to say. Oh yes, and I’m touched by your concern for my progeny.

    1. Your deflective sarcasm, your refusal to admit admit and apologize for the evil brought about by your cohorts, and failure to publish what I just recently posted above, further highlights what side you are on.

      1. The commentary on here was not personal, is was meant to see if you would be willing to turn against something you were associated with given sufficient condemnatory information, and also to encourage you to contribute to culture vitalism.

      2. “Don’t join the book burners. Don’t think you’re going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed.”
        — Dwight D. Eisenhower

      3. https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfl1/v/t1.0-9/12039329_10156030531305175_901163915375083005_n.jpg?oh=ea7693313b0b02f779a3f13699f01d8f&oe=565D034E

        I will leave with 2 references that make relevant points that should be taken into consideration regardless of the antagonism in this exchange:

        “On Genetic Interests Family, Ethnicity, And Humanity In An Age Of Mass Migration” by Frank Kemp Salter: https://archive.org/details/OnGeneticInterestsFamilyEthnicityAndHumanityInAnAgeOfMassMigration2006ByFrankKempSalter

        “New Theory Of Human Evolution” by Sir Arthur Keith: https://archive.org/details/Keith-ANewTheoryOfHumanEvolution1948

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s