The Refined Robbery of Robin Hood

Powerful piece in Forbes, of all places, that deconstructs insurers’ announcements that they’ll retain some of the more popular provisions of the ACA.

I have often suggested that I suspect the Republican leadership in Congress of going to sleep each night secretly praying that Obamacare will survive the Supreme Court test. The leadership knows very well that, as much as the American public says they dislike the Affordable Care Act, there is little desire to see some of the more popular elements that have already taken root vanish into the legal ether….

If you consider returning to a system where fifty million Americans remain uninsured, this might be your happy ending. If you’ve pleased that babies born with a serious medical condition will, once again, be unable to receive health insurance—thereby dooming the parents of these children and, ultimately, the children themselves to financial ruin because of their bad luck—it’s all good. If you’re okay with the demise of the medical loss ratio requirements, allowing the insurance companies to once again decide how many of your premium dollars they wish to spend on actual health care while pumping ridiculous sums into marketing and administrative overhead, sums that you and I pay for via our ever rising premiums, then you’ve got yourself a victory for free enterprise.

Me personally, I’m starting to suspect that the right has been taking advantage of a huge misunderstanding on the part of some of its less-privileged supporters. I think there are people (white people, anyway, from real American places) who believe that the GOP wants to give them free health care with no strings attached, but that Obama cooked up this One World Socialist atrocity called “mandates” to make them pay for it–and to make it really expensive by requiring Catholics to use expensive birth control. I’m being facetious, of course, but it genuinely baffles me how people who claim to have such admiration for free enterprise have so little understanding of how risk pools work–and fail to see that for profit insurers already have de facto death panels passing judgment on sick people every day.

As a student of secret societies, it’s fascinating too to realize how many of them were conceived as occasions to sell insurance–they’re risk pools, but tarted up with all the rigamarole of a fellowship. The Oddfellows, for example, provided burial insurance to its members; the Woodmen of the World was (and I believe still survives as) an insurance company. The KKK, which was very much a for-profit organization in its second incarnation in the teens and ’20s, sold life insurance. In CULTS, I quote an initiation oath from the Ancient Order of the Foresters, circa 1907:

It has been truthfully said that nothing is more uncertain than the proportion of sickness and death which falls to the lot of the individual, but that nothing is more certain than the percentage of sickness and death among a multitude of men. As a multitude of men, seeking to help each other, and to bear one another’s burdens, the Ancient Order of Foresters exists and has existed from time immemorial. It assumes the individual’s inevitable liability for sickness and death, and distributes it among a number of his fellow members, who willingly bear their share, knowing that their own turn will come in time.

This, then, is Benevolence: the refined robbery of Robin Hood. The word “Benevolence” is derived from two Latin words signifying good will, and is synonymous with bengnity, humanity, tenderness, and kindness. It does not mean charity: for charity, while a worthy virtue, and the corner stone of many societies, has no place in the Forestric vocabulary. We do not dispense charity. Whatsoever our members may receive, they obtain as a matter of right, for which they have paid, and for which they are expected to pay.

I’m one of those dreary progressives who thinks that Obama should have staked everything on a single payer system. I’m sure it would have failed, but at least he would have made a point. Turning as it will on legal arcana, the seemingly inevitable failure of Obamacare will be much harder to parse.

Rereading the Foresters oath, I wonder if the problem with Obamacare was that it wasn’t enough fun.

If you enjoyed this post, please go to my Facebook page and “like” it (there is a button that will take you there on the top right hand side of this page). You can also follow me on Twitter.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s