November 25, 2009

9/11 Pager messages

The Guardian announces Wikileaks’ publication of intercepts of more than half a million pager messages, many of them sent by government officials, on 9/11. The messages are being dumped throughout the day today; click here to follow.

Messages released thus far provide evidence of the swirling fear and confusion that marked the day–and will undoubtedly be picked over by conspiracy theorists for evidence that some of the pagers knew precisely what was happening and why. According to the Guardian, “One message from a New York City official sent just minutes after the first attack said: ‘WTC has been hit by an airplane and a bomb.’ Another says: ‘It’s reported that a US military helicopter circled the building then crashed into or next to the Pentagon.’ Later in the day, a message presciently says: ‘We are bombing Afghanistan.’”

November 24, 2009

Shouting Fire

When I guest-blogged on Boing Boing a couple of weeks ago a lot of frustrated would-be posters wrongly assumed that it was me that was preventing them from being heard. It wasn’t. Boing Boing reserves the right to delete or “disemvowel” comments at will and without explanation–it employs moderators to make sure that racist, sexist, homophobic, and gratuitously ad hominem language is suppressed, that posters aren’t flamed, and that a reasonably civil tone is maintained. Links to relatively innocuous You Tube videos, for example, were taken down if they were hosted on sites that also sell The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The first amendment doesn’t compel third parties to provide a free forum for protected speech–it only prevents the government from banning it. Telling someone to peddle their filth elsewhere or quietly suppressing their remarks isn’t remotely the same thing as censorship. Organizing a boycott of Rush Limbaugh’s or Glenn Beck’s sponsors isn’t an assault on free speech either; it’s free enterprise.

That said, when I started this blog, I decided that I would have an open door policy for posts, so long as they didn’t specifically libel or defame any private citizens. I don’t have a brand to protect, I don’t carry advertisements, I’m not afraid of controversy, and the only agenda I have is the promotion of critical thinking. If I post something about, say, the irrationality of 9/11 denial and a 9/11 Denialist responds by posting something irrational, then the poster has helped me prove my point. If on the other hand the Denialist catches me repeating someone’s falsehood or saying something that’s otherwise in error, it’s still a win for both of us, because the truth is served. The other day I wrote something snarky about the Anti-Defamation League, prompting two anti-Semites to post some really scurrilous commentary. Their words were vile and hurtful, but–and I’m sure this wasn’t their intention–they also provided eloquent testimony as to the continuing importance and relevance of the ADL’s mission. A third post appeared this morning, which pissed me off royally and made me realize that even my tolerance has its limits.

Since I started writing this, I noticed that Green Left Weekly just announced that it’s dis-allowing posts about 9/11 Truth conspiracies on its message board, citing me as one of their reasons (“Boingboing had as their guest blogger a week or two ago Arthur Goldwag who has written a great deal on what’s wrong with conspiracy theorists in general and why its impossible to seriously discuss them”). It’s ironic, but not at all unreasonable, considering Green Left Weekly’s explicitly activist agenda. I’m going to keep my own door open for now. But if enough haters abuse my hospitality, I’ll have to make some changes as well.

November 24, 2009

With friends like these

Attention is beginning to be paid to the comment Sarah Palin made about settlements during her Barbara Walters interview: “I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don’t think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand.”

Obama’s is not the first administration to oppose the settlements in the West Bank, as the Christian Science Monitor notes:

The administrations of Presidents Nixon, Johnson, Ford, Carter, and Clinton all considered the annexation of land seized in 1967 illegal. President Ronald Reagan took a position that some might be legal, but opposed their expansion. Prior to becoming president, as the US ambassador to the UN, George H.W. Bush called the settlements illegal. His son, President George W. Bush, thought natural growth for existing settlements was fine, but was opposed to new ones.

In the absence of any demographic data indicating a rising trend in Jewish immigration, some suspect that Palin is referring to a Pre-millennial Dispensationalist Endtime scenario, in which the Jews are ingathered in Israel to convert to Christianity or die in the Battle of Armageddon. Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic spoke to Dr. Thomas Ice of the Pre-Trib Research Center of Liberty University about this:

An alarm bell went off in my head when I heard Palin talk about “days and weeks.” It’s quite one thing to say that Israel needs settlements to contain its growing population (a belief unsupported by the facts, but I’ll deal with that another time), but it’s something else entirely to predict that Jews in the Diaspora will imminently be flooding the Holy Land. I asked Dr. Ice if he thought that this statement by Palin, who has been exposed to this brand of evangelical thinking in her Alaska churches, was informed by these beliefs.

“I’ve read that Palin has been part of an apparently unique movement I’ve heard of — that her pastor, when she was in the Assembly of God, believed based on some personal revelation he claims to have gotten from God, that the Jews would move to Alaska during the Tribulation. But nevertheless, my understanding from what I’ve seen is that she holds fairly typical Protestant Zionist beliefs, and one of those beliefs is the regathering of the Jews in Israel.”

Ice told me he believes this sort of thinking is supported by the facts. “Over forty percent of the world’s Jews now live in Israel. What Sarah Palin probably believes is that this is the first regathering,” when the Jews all migrate to Israel. “This is a condition for the second regathering, the regathering in belief, when the Jewish nation is converted. Then there will be the battle of Armageddon, because remember, Satan wants to wipe out the Jews to prevent the Second Coming, but Jesus comes to rescue the beleaguered Jews. We believe that the Jews are going to be converted so that they can call on Jesus to rescue them from Satan.”

Years ago, during the second Intifada, I attended a Bar Mitzvah of one of my cousins’ sons. The rabbi sermonized at great length about his confusion. As a life-long Democrat, liberal, and intellectual, he couldn’t understand how Nobel Prize laureates like Desmond Tutu and Jose Saramago could be so wrong about Israel while Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, who he considered to be wrong about everything else, were right. The ADL’s Abe Foxman–who I would guess is much more liberal than Sarah Palin on a host of issues–may also be troubled by cognitive dissonance, but not so much that he’s willing to reject Palin’s and her ilk’s friendship. On Sunday he called the JTA to vent his outrage at Jeremy Ben-Ami of the liberal J-Street lobby, who’d said that Palin’s “pandering to her right-wing base comes at the expense of the security of the State of Israel” and reveals “a glaring ignorance of damaging facts and a callous disregard of past and present U.S. policy.”

Foxman….specifically called JTA to slam J Street’s statement, asserting that it was “over the line.” Foxman said it was “the height of chutzpah” for J Street to claim that it knows what is best for the security of Israel.

“They’re attacking a celebrity for supporting Israel, but not in the way they want her to support Israel,” Foxman said.

Foxman acknowledged that he thought Palin’s remarks were a “simplistic effort to be supportive of the Israeli government,” but also insisted that they were “clear and well-intentioned” and “didn’t put any lives at stake.”

November 19, 2009

Rock star deaths and conspiracy theory

Click here to read this article from the Houston Press on the Top Rock Star Death Conspiracies.

This made me think of the conspiracy theorist Mae Brussell (1922-1988), the daughter of the “Rabbi to the Stars” Edgar Magnin and granddaughter of I. Magnin of department store fame, who, starting with a critique of the Warren Commission, wrote and broadcast tirelessly about an on-going Nazi conspiracy within the American government. I quoted a bit from an interview she did with Tom Davis in 1981 about John Lennon’s murder in CULTS, CONSPIRACIES AND SECRET SOCIETIES (though I am embarrassed to see that I mis-identified the interviewer in the book as Alex Constantine, who edited her speeches, interviews, and articles for the definitive collection FASCISM IN AMERICA: THE ESSENTIAL MAE BRUSSELL. Constantine is also the author of THE COVERT WAR AGAINST ROCK: What You Don’t Know About the Deaths of Jim Morrison, Tupac Shakur, etc.). Here is a slightly longer excerpt from the interview:

Tom: You apparently believe there was a government conspiracy to assassinate and silence John Lennon which was conducted by the same people who murdered other political figures and musicians in the past eighteen years?

Mae: Absolutely! The federal government has maintained active programs to eliminate rock musicians and disrupt rock concerts. Senator Frank Church’s Committee hearings in 1975 and the FBI Cointel-Programs clearly document the intent to break up any gatherings of the “new left”. Nothing brought anti-war demonstrators together with political messages more effectively than music festivals.
There is hard evidence the CIA assigned agents to “investigate the music industry.” After the murders of Tim Buckley, Jim Croce, and Mama Cass Elliot, more information surfaced about earlier mysterious deaths of Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison, and Janis Joplin. Listed below, but not updated this past year, are some of the rock musicians who have died since the Huston Plan and the FBI Cointel-Program were activated. If these people had been taking any kinds of drugs, there is the distinct possibility that specific poisons were added to their drugs, enough to be fatal, to make it appear that they had died from a simple “overdose”.

John Lennon Paul Kossoff John Bonham
Elvis Presley Jim Reeves Steve Parson
Buddy Holly Berry Oakley Bob Marley
Otis Redding Tim Buckley Sal Mineo
Brian Jones Jim Croce Harry Chapin
Jimi Hendrix Richard Earina Brian Epstein, Beatles manager
Janis Joplin Lenny Bruce
Jim Morrison Larry Williams Michael Jeffery, Jimi Hendrix manager
Duane Allman Bon Scott, AC/DC
Mama Cass Elliot Richie Valens Rod McKernan, “Pig Pen” of the Grateful Dead
Gram Parsons J. P. Richardson
Phil Oakes Ronnie Van Zandt
Marc Bolan Steve Gains Donald Rex Jackson, Grateful Dead mgr.
Keith Moon Sid Viscious

The murder of John Lennon is the tragic finale to an entire era, the reminder that once an artist becomes as popular and as political as he was, his enemies will be waiting to make sure his messages never appear again to awaken the slumbering youth.

November 19, 2009

Personal appearance

For anyone local, I will be giving a brief reading from CULTS, CONSPIRACIES, AND SECRET SOCIETIES and answering questions on Saturday, November 21, at 1:00 pm at synagogue Kolot Chayeinu, which meets at the Church of Gethsemane, 1012 8th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11215. (Suggested donation–to the synagogue, not me–$5.00). Hope to see some of you there.

November 19, 2009

ADL’s “Rage Grows in America” Report

“In the year since we marked the historic election of the nation’s first African-American president we have seen a tremendous amount of anger and hostility,” Abraham H. Foxman, the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, recently remarked. “There is a toxic atmosphere of rage in America being witnessed at many levels, and it raises fundamental questions for our society. While not all of America has bought into these conspiracies, they seem to be seeping more and more into the mainstream. And since many of these expressions are interconnected in some significant ways, we wanted to try and connect the dots and ask the basic questions of why the anger, why now, and where might it lead.”

The ADL’s Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies report was released Monday; it can be found in its entirety here. It covers many of the same groups and people that I’ve written about on this blog, in my book CULTS, CONSPIRACIES, AND SECRET SOCIETIES, and elsewhere: Birthers, Tea parties, Glenn Beck, Alex Jones, the militia movement, and the Bizarro-world notion that Obama is a modern-day Hitler. That last one is especially galling since a critical segment of the “patriot” constituency (not all of it by any means–birthers Orly Taitz and Philip Berg are Jewish, for example) denies that Hitler did anything particularly terrible to Europe’s Jews, or nothing, anyway, that they didn’t deserve.

It’s a relief to see the ADL expending its considerable resources on something other than knee-jerk apologetics for Israel or Armenian holocaust denialism; it’s nice too to see that they’ve pissed off Commentary, which scolded them for “choosing to frame its report…..in such a way as to associate all those who have opposed Obama’s policies in one way or another with the far Right.” I wish they’d been more explicit about the implicit, sub rosa Anti-Semitism that does characterize many of these groups, including Jones’, who stridently denies it. “Now that global anti-semitism is on the wane,” he declares in the characteristically self-aggrandizing rejoinder that is posted on his Propaganda Matrix website under the headline Purging the Undesirables: The ADL Attempts to Pin a Yellow Star on Grass Roots America, “the ADL has resolved to ceaselessly fearmonger about ‘conspiracy theorists’ and American taxpayers who merely express anger about how they have been financially raped by the multi-trillion dollar bailout and the continued looting of the economy by private central banks and offshore cartels.”

The ADL has launched a new purge against its political enemies in the form of a major report that equates skepticism and distrust of government with ‘a toxic atmosphere of rage,’ which is threatening to boil over in the form of violence, specifically targeting Alex Jones as ‘The Conspiracy King’ and inferring that people upset with Barack Obama’s policies are potential mass murderers. The tone of the ADL’s hit piece basically implies that Alex Jones and his ilk are such a threat to the establishment that they should be removed from society, which ironically is exactly how Hitler dealt with his political enemies in Nazi Germany. The ADL is allegorically pinning a yellow star on “conspiracy theorists,” Oath Keepers, Tea Party protesters, and anyone else who dares express dissent in response to the financial looting of the country or Barack Obama’s big government agenda.

The article goes on to assert that no American “grass roots” group has ever committed or threatened to commit violence–they have always “urged unity and discouraged division, while promoting a peaceful message of non-violence.” “All the major acts of violence in connection with the militia movement during the 1990’s were committed by the government and federal agents”–at Ruby Ridge, Waco, and in Oklahoma City (Timothy McVeigh, it explains, was trained and “steered” by the FBI when he blew up the Alfred P. Murrah Building).

“International bankers,” “global governance,” and “one world currency” are all memes that allude directly or indirectly to the Conspiracy of the Learned Elders of Zion–as does the notion of a New World Order. Sometimes you don’t have to dig very deep at all into conspiracist literature to find anti-Semitism: Here’s a little something about the origins of the ADL that I just stumbled on at the Conspiracy Planet website.

In Jewish Hate, the Media, and the ADL, Dr. William Pierce concisely explains why and how the ADL was formed: ‘The ADL was organized in 1913 by a group of rich Jews specifically as a response to a notorious child-rape and murder in Georgia. Leo Frank was a Jew who owned a pencil factory in Atlanta.In 1913, he raped and murdered one of his White female employees, 14-year-old Mary Phagan. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. The governor of Georgia, in response to Jewish lobbying — and, most believe, in response to a large Jewish bribe — almost immediately commuted the death sentence.’

Now for Something Completely Different: A Real Holocaust

So, what is the ADL covering up these days?

The Armenian Holocaust of 1915, in which more than 1.5 million Armenians were murdered. You’ve heard the term “young Turks?” Well, it was the “Young Turks” of last century’s Turkey who conducted that little piece of genocide.

What does this have to do with Abe Foxman? Lots. He’s related.

You see, the “Young Turks” almost exclusively were Jews who, as “Donmeh Muslims,” then controlled Turkey.

Dr. William Pierce, by the way, is the author of THE TURNER DIARIES, the novel about an American race war that inspired Tim McVeigh with its account of the destruction of the FBI building in Washington, DC by a fertilizer bomb in a parked truck. The “Donmeh Muslims” were desccended from followers of Sabbatai Zevi–who converted from Judaism to Islam in 1666–a full 250 years before the Armenian holocaust. Some of the Young Turks were indeed Donmeh; but there was no connection–institutional or sentimental–between them and Judaism or the nascent Zionist movement. This hasn’t stopped a number of fringe historians from developing a conspiracy theory in which the Donmeh, working with the Masons, exterminated the Armenians out of jealousy of their superior commercial skills and to clear the way for a future state of Israel (which the traditional Muslim Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamid II had been opposed to). Some go so far as to say that the Zionists then “created” the Shoah, mostly by propaganda, sometimes by collaborating with Nazis in fratricidal murders, as a means of peopling Palestine with Jewish survivors.

Of course the real reason the ADL–along with the American Jewish Committee, B’nai Brith International, and the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs–opposed Congressional recognition of the Armenian genocide as genocide back in 2007 was Realpolitik pure and simple. The Jews of Turkey supported their government’s denialist position out of fear of a Muslim backlash; there was concern that a challenge from foreign Jews might jeopardize Turkey’s relatively friendly relations with Israel. It was a shameful stance indeed and one that the ADL has since backed off on.

November 17, 2009

An ethnography of 9/11 Truth

Regular readers of this blog know that I have posted about 9/11 Truth from time to time–here , here and here, and twice on Boing Boing during my guest blog stint (click here and here).

The Boing Boing posts especially inspired a lot of commentary on both sides of the issue, much of it quite emotional, some of it startlingly anti-semitic (Boing Boing swiftly redacted most of the really offensive stuff). Some of the commentary overflowed onto this blog (I moderate comments much less strictly than Boing Boing does) and can be found on the Bulletin Board and attached to the Boing Boing links. The Truther community is far from homogenous (“Truther,” by the way, is a name that most of them detest–I only use it for lack of a better term). Some members are indistinguishable from old-fashioned New World Order conspiracists; to them 9/11 is simply the latest evidence of treason on the part of America’s oligarchic plutocrats. Others are leftwing ideologues–they genuinely believe that the US is a fascist police state, or at best that a conspiratorial “deep state” exists within the constitutional republic, which 9/11 exposed to the light. They are frustrated that prominent leftists refuse to endorse their conclusions or offer them public support. Finally there are those whose interest is seemingly confined to the apparent enigmas and lacunae in the official story–except that so much of the “evidence” that they believe discredits it remains firmly entrenched in the realm of hearsay, anecdote, and assertion (for example, they focus on the group of young Israelis–supposedly with connections to Mossad–who were observed photographing and seemingly celebrating the destruction of the towers; on the thermite traces that were supposedly detected in the ruins; or how videos of WTC7’s collapse resemble a controlled demolition; eyewitness accounts point to explosions in the basements of one of the towers and WTC7; the supposed paucity of wreckage on the Pentagon lawn, etc.).

A day or two after my second Boing Boing post I received comments and then e mails from an Irish blogger named Damien DeBarra, a longtime contributor to Blather.net (a vast collection of stories about UFOs, crytpozoology, crop circles, ghosts, ESP, etc.–what might be characterized as Forteana except that its approach is both skeptical and structuralist. As DeBarra puts it, “we’re not interested in UFOs so much as we are in UFO stories“). DeBarra is a student at the University of Edinburgh on the Msc. in e-learning course, currently doing the ‘Digital Cultures’ semester. He sent me the link to a lecture he’d just delivered in Dublin on the ethnography of the 9/11 Truth community as it is manifested in Internet documentaries; click here for a precis; here for the You tube videos of the presentation itself. Though I’m sure denizens of the 9/11 Truth world won’t relish being subjected to anthropological analysis, as though they were an exotic tribe, DeBarra’s presentation makes for fascinating reading and listening.

When I mentioned my dismay at both the level of vitriol and the implicit anti-Semitism of some of the other posts I’d received, DeBarra replied as follows:

I hear you on the anti-semitism thing. I mentioned this in the talk a bit….. Basically, a month or two ago a close friend of mine came at with the 9/11 thing and started spouting some stuff that was borderline anti-semitic. He’s not an anti-semite, but he had been so persuaded by what he was watching that he was starting to sound like one. I couldn’t help think of the story of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ from the late 19th century – the original viral urban legend and how the same nonsense seemed to be happening again.

I was sufficently shocked that I decided I was going to look at this again – for me the Jewish aspect of this is like a cancerous streak running through the underbelly of the narrative, just bubbling under the surface but not given full voice in most of the conspiracy theories.

I also get what you mean about the personal issues: I was back in Dublin last Friday (I live in London) and was explaining to a few folks in the pub what I was up to for my talk. 0 to 60 in 4 seconds on the rageometer. ‘What the fuck makes you such an expert?’. ‘You’re gonna get creamed’. ‘You’re a cynical bastard’ etc etc. Literally couldn’t believe my ears!

I’m used to people being pissed at me online (see blather.net) but this is different – it’s vitriol of a level I’ve previously only seen from the Westboro Baptist Church. In fact that was what struck me the most – the almost religious defence of the 9/11 movies and theories. Theory, it seems, has hardened into dogma.

If I had any wit left I’d go the Robert Anton Wilson route and come up with some 9/11 ‘catmas’, but I’m losing the will to live from talking about it.

Anyway, I’ll let you know as soon as the blasted talk is uploaded online. In the meantime, I leave with this video which made me snigger like a schoolboy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xV7Ha3VDbzE

The You Tube link is to a College Humor sketch about 9/11 conspiracy theories that made me laugh too. Enjoy it.

November 16, 2009

Yavapai County sheriff’s update on James Arthur Ray investigation

The Yavapai County sheriff’s office issued an update on its homicide investigation last week (the link was only good for a week so I’ve taken it down). The gist of the sheriff’s statement was that the investigation involves hundreds of interviews and the collection and analysis of extensive forensic and medical evidence, so it will not be completed until some time next month. They will hold a press conference when they turn their report into the District Attorney’s office.

With civil lawsuits beginning to be filed–including one from the Lakota Nation, which demands restitution for Ray’s desecration of Lakota customs as per the terms of the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie (click here for the statement from Lakota spokesman Longblackcat, here for the lawsuit)–Ray has put his Beverly Hills home, which he just purchased last March for $4 million, up for sale. According to the Phoenix New Times news blog, his asking price is $5.4 million.

November 13, 2009

One thing Sarah Palin & I have in common

From GAWKER’s 10 Juicy items in the sneak peaks of Sarah Palin’s historical-fiction memoir (#10) :

No Flipping to the Back. Second-most conspicuous absence: an index, which Halperin says is “subtle revenge on the party’s Washington establishment, whose members tend to flip to the back pages and scan for their own names.” This is possible, but I’m much more inclined to believe that her editors plumb forgot that this peculiar, vapid woman they were working with is an actual politician, who actually interacts with important people, and slipped into Chicken Noodle Soup for the Soul mode by accident.

Andrew Sullivan takes note and links to Samuel P. Jacobs at the Daily Beast , who develops the “vengeance” theme at greater length and offers a more probable explanation:

One answer: time. It takes two to three weeks to put together a good index, says Peter Osnos, the founder of Public Affairs, who has published Bill Clinton, Vernon Jordan, Scott McClellan, and nearly every other Washington macher over the years. Cutting an index can mean the difference between getting a book into stores well before Thanksgiving or missing the holiday sales season altogether. Speed is at an even greater premium now, in the age of e-books and instant downloads on the Kindle. And of course, skipping the index means fewer pages—and fewer dollars spent to bring the book to market. “Every penny counts,” Osnos said.

See my post Negative Reviews and Indexes if you want to see why I relate.

November 13, 2009

The Conspiracies of Sarah Palin

My last guest blog post at Boing Boing: click here to read. Things will soon return to normal here.